A little prevention … well, you know the rest. In medicine, prevention aims to detect problems before they get worse, affecting both the patient health and finance.
One of the most popular parts of the Affordable Care Act, which allows patients to get certain tests or treatments without spending cash to cover copayments or deductibles, is based on this idea.
“There are still some gaps that need to be filled,” said Katie Keith, a researcher at the Center on Health Insurance Reforms at Georgetown University. But, he said, the law “unquestionably” made preventive care more affordable.
Since the end of 2010, when this provision of the ACA came into force, many patients have not paid anything when they undergo routine mammograms, receive one of more than a dozen vaccines, receive birth control or are screened for other conditions, such as diabetes, colon cancer, and so on. depression and sexually transmitted diseases.
This can translate into big savings, especially when many of these tests can cost thousands of dollars.
However, this popular provision includes challenges and warnings, from an ongoing lawsuit in Texas that could overturn it, to complex, obtuse qualifiers that may limit its breadth, leaving patients with medical bills.
KHN spoke with several experts to help guide consumers through this confusing landscape.
Your # 1 tip: Always check with your own health plan beforehand to make sure a test, vaccine, procedure, or service you need is covered and meets the requirements for the no-cost benefit. And, if you receive a bill from a doctor, clinic, or hospital that you think may be eligible for a cost-sharing plan, call your insurer to see or dispute the charge.
Here are five more things to know:
1. Your insurance is important.
The law covers most types of health insurance, such as ACA-qualified health plans that consumers have purchased for themselves, occupational insurance, Medicare, and Medicaid. Generally, pre-ACA inherited health plans, which existed before March 2010 and have not changed since then, and most short-term or limited benefit plans are not included. Medicare and Medicaid rules about who is eligible for which cost-free testing may vary from those of commercial insurance, and in some cases Medicare Advantage plans may have more generous coverage than the traditional federal program.
2. Not all preventive services are covered.
Currently, the federal government lists 22 broad categories of coverage for adults, an additional 27 specifically for women and 29 for children.
To access these lists, vaccines, screening tests, medications, and services must have been recommended by one of the four groups of medical experts. One is the U.S. Preventive Services Working Group, a non-governmental advisory group that weighs the benefits and potential drawbacks of screening tests when used on the general population.
For example, the working group recently recommended lowering the age for colon cancer screening to include people aged 45 to 49 years. This means more people won’t have to wait until their 50th birthday to skip copayments or deductibles for screening. Still, younger people might be left out a little longer if their health plan is implemented in the calendar year, which many do, because those plans aren’t technically required to meet them until January.
This area is also one in which Medicare sets its own rules that may differ from the working group’s recommendations, said Anna Howard, a specialist in access to care for the American Society’s Cancer Action Network. Cancer. Medicare covers stool tests or flexible sigmoidoscopies, which detect colon cancer, without spreading the costs from the age of 50. There is no age limit for screening colonoscopies, although they are limited to once every 10 years for people at normal risk. Coverage for high-risk patients allows for more frequent screening.
Many of the working group’s recommendations are limited to very specific populations.
For example, the working group recommended the detection of abdominal aortic aneurysm only for men aged 65 to 75 years with a history of smoking.
Others, including women, should get tested if their doctors believe they have symptoms or are at risk. Then, these tests could be diagnostic, rather than preventive, leading to a copayment or a deductible charge.
3. There may be limits.
Insurers have room for maneuver over what the regulations allow, but they have also been warned that they cannot be thrifty.
California, for example, recently cracked down on insurers limiting free testing for sexually transmitted diseases to once a year, saying it was not appropriate under state and federal laws.
The ACA sets some parameters. Federal guidance says smoking cessation programs, for example, should include drug coverage, counseling, and up to two attempts to quit a year.
With contraception, insurers must offer at least one copay-free option in most birth control categories, but they are not required to cover all contraceptive products on the market without copayments. For example, insurers might choose to focus on generics, rather than branded products. (The law also allows employers to choose not to participate in the birth control mandate).
4. Some tests, often face-to-face, have special challenges that affect coverage determinations.
When the ACA came into force, problematic points arose. There was a lot of drama around colonoscopies. Initially, patients found that they were billed for copayments if polyps were found. But health regulators put an end to that, saying the removal of polyps is considered an essential part of the screening test. These rules currently apply to commercial insurance and are still being gradually incorporated into Medicare.
More recently, federal guidance clarified that patients cannot be charged by colonoscopies ordered after suspicious findings in stool-based tests, such as those mailed to patients ’homes, or colon exams using CT scanners.
The rules apply to occupational insurance and other commercial insurance with one caveat: policies whose plan years begin in May come into effect for policies, so some patients with calendar year coverage are not yet eligible. ‘have included.
At that point, it will be “a gigantic victory,” said Dr. Mark Fendrick, director of the University of Michigan’s Securities-Based Insurance Design Center.
But, he noted, Medicare is not included. He and others are asking Medicare to follow suit.
These differences in payment rules depending on whether an exam is considered a diagnostic or screening test they are a problem for other types of tests, including mammograms.
This recently prompted Laura Brewer of Grass Valley, California, when a mammogram and ultrasound was done in March, six months after a different radiologist had detected a cyst in a previous examination. The previous test cost him nothing, so he was surprised by his bill of more than $ 1,677 for procedures that are now considered diagnostic.
“They’re giving me the same service and they changed it so it was diagnostic instead of screening,” Brewer said.
Keith of Georgetown pointed out a related complication: it may not be a specific development or symptom that triggers this change. “If patients have a family history and need to be tested more often, it is often coded as a diagnosis,” he said.
5. Vaccines and medications can also be complicated.
Dozens of vaccines for children and adults, including chickenpox, measles and tetanus, are covered at no cost. So are certain preventative medications, including some drugs for breast cancer and statins for high cholesterol. Pre-exposure medications to prevent HIV, along with much of the associated testing and follow-up care, are also covered at no cost to high-risk seronegative adults.
So what happens?
Overall, the ACA has helped reduce out-of-pocket costs for preventative care, Keith said. But, like almost everything else in the law, it has also attracted criticism.
They include conservatives opposed to some of the free services, who filed the lawsuit in a Texas federal district court that, if imposed, could overturn or restrict a portion of the law that offers no cost-sharing for the preventive care.
A ruling in this case, Kelley v. Becerra, the latest in a series of challenges to the ACA since it went into effect, may come this summer and will likely be appealed.
If the final decision invalidates the preventive mandate, millions of patients, including those who buy their own insurance and those who get it through their work, could be affected.
“Each insurer or employer should decide what preventive services to cover and whether to do so with cost sharing,” Keith said. “Therefore, even those who did not lose access to preventive services themselves might have to pay out of pocket all or part of preventive care.”
KHN (Kaiser Health News) is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism on health issues. Along with policy analysis and surveys, KHN is one of the top three operational programs KFF (Kaiser Family Foundation). KFF is a gifted non-profit organization that provides information on health issues in the nation.
- In:
- Patient protection law and affordable care
- Health care
Add Comment